Figure 56. Global summary of seismic tomography sections superimposed on 60 km depth seismic tomography plan.
This figure shows all the Northern and Southern Hemisphere seismic tomographic sections that have been examined in the last part of this webinar. I will not try and analyse them as we have already analysed each section as we go. However, there are conclusions that can be made from examination of these sections which are outlined below.
Conclusions
Validity of EagleEye structures.
The first half of the webinar showed numerous examples of plans and sections that have been enhanced with EagleEye (MRI type detail) and which have outlined structures which correlate excellently with well documented structures. Some examples documented in this webinar are; Chixculub impact, African Rift System, 660 km depth seismic discontinuity, North American and South American subductions, Japan/Asia subduction, Tonga Trench Pacific/Australian plate boundary, Pacific/Nazca plate boundary, Mid Atlantic Ridge North American/Eurasia plate boundary, Africa/Europe collision zone, French Alps nappe structure, North American Glenville front).
Whenever the plans and sections were married together the faults and other structures fitted together well. Calculate the odds of this happening if EagleEye produced random structures! All this evidence suggests emphatically that the EagleEye system is producing valid structural results that can be trusted.
Evidence of a current Brittle Earth.
Figure 56 above shows there is an abundance of subvertical and flatter brittle structures on these sections that extend all over Earth from the Outer Core to the surface. These occur most noticeably at plate boundaries and extend through the entirety of the mobile mantle and lava lamp type plumes.
This suggests that there is no worldwide mobile mantle (would not preserve structures) and the plumes are merely insitu replacement by heat and fluids of the lithosphere which is brittle right to the Outer Core.
Block Tectonics model.
There is no conflict with the concept of continental movement (as this is easily measured) but this worldwide evidence of brittle lithosphere right to the core suggests that this movement must operate with very different tectonics from the current Mobile Mantle/Plate Tectonics hypothesis.
I suggest an alteration of the name of this hypothesis to the Block Tectonics hypothesis.
Many of our current paradigms of Earth Evolution have been disproved by this rigorous analysis of seismic section structural geology using the EagleEye system.
Can EagleEye be proved wrong?
In order to prove me wrong on my suggested changes to the tectonics of Earth’s Evolution, one must prove that these EagleEye derived plans and sections are not representing the structure and morphology of the lithology from the surface to the core.
Currently this detailed geological information is not available on accessible publications so there is nothing to compare the EagleEye structures with!
So, in order to prove me wrong geoscientists must come up with a system of getting structural detail from plans and sections that compares with, or is better than the EagleEye plans, or, prove that the EagleEye system does not produce valid structures.
Until then you have not proved me wrong.
The current published plans and sections rely on mathematical modelling of earthquake waves and present this as a colour contour plan that shows no structural geology.
So can I urge all geophysicists and software engineers to concentrate on improving your software system so results are at least as good, but preferably much better than EagleEye. We will then all be able to analyse Earth’s structural geology.
That is my challenge to my fellow geoscientists!
The next post will complete the Earth Evolution webinar papers.
I will post the links to the previous 16 posts and the Webinar video with a brief description of the contents.
Webinar on Global Mineralising Systems and their associated Exploration Targeting potential.
I am giving an AusIMM webinar on the 23rd May on this subject. I have produced many exploration targeting plans along these lines over the years which I am informed are used quite extensively by those in the know. This webinar will summarise that research.
Cheers and happy softwaring!
Bob